From the issue dated May 11, 2001
Some professors fear substance is sacrificed for the sake of keeping students' attention
By ALISON SCHNEIDER
Textbooks have one big strike against them. They almost never talk about sex
or death. And when they do, it's about as gripping as an actuarial table.
That might not matter if textbooks didn't bear an unfortunate resemblance to the
proverbial 800-pound -- or 800-page -- gorilla. But imagine wading through
Anna Karenina sans the sizzle and suicide, and you've got a pretty clear
picture of what critics say is wrong with the typical textbook: They're all
talk, no action.
Here to counter the ho-hum nature of textbook writing are a growing cadre of
professors willing to try their hand at something more novel. Imaginary
characters are creeping into cryptology textbooks. Economists are writing fables
about free trade. Even subatomic particles are enjoying their moment in the
fictive sun, starring in stories about -- what else? -- sex and death. Oh, yes,
and basic principles of physics, like atom formation, too:
From the very first instant of our meeting, I have felt he is the nucleus for me. Our attraction for each other draws us closer and closer. This time there is no inherent reluctance from my side and we strive for a stable bond. His courtship is short.
-- From Muonic Rhapsody and Other Encounters (Roli Books, 1995).
What's going on? Has the traditional textbook had its day? Has education been
supplanted by edutainment -- academe's version of Pablum for intellectual
lightweights? Or is a new form of instruction emerging, one that uses plot to
improve pedagogy -- albeit plot on the order of bad John Grisham, not John
Steinbeck?
The answer, of course, depends on whom you ask. Alan P. Lightman, a professor of
humanities at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the author of a
narrative-style textbook as well as several novels that merge science and
literature, has reservations. "It's very, very dangerous to write a novel for
pedagogical purposes," he says. With their typically feeble plots and
cardboard-cutout characters, he says, "almost all of them fail. Pedagogical
novels don't work as novels."
But they can work as pedagogy, insists Lali Chatterjee, the author of the
educational novel Muonic Rhapsody. Yes, these books tend to rely on
cheesy gimmicks and cheap thrills, she says, but they can also make daunting
disciplines accessible and understandable. Face it, Ms. Chatterjee says, boring
textbooks are out; bodice-rippers are in.
With 100 journal articles under her belt, you'd think Ms. Chatterjee, a
professor of physics and astronomy at Cumberland University, would feel
otherwise. But her scholarly work hasn't affected her students nearly as much,
she says, as Muonic Rhapsody or her narrative-style textbook, The
Exotic Lifestyles of Subatomic Particles (Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company,
2000).
Ask James Carfi, a Cumberland senior. He planned on majoring in business, but
changed his mind after reading Muonic Rhapsody. He's graduating this
month with a major in physics and a minor in business and information systems.
Muonic Rhapsody "captured my attention,'' Mr. Carfi says. Had he just
read a standard textbook, "I don't think I would have been as interested. I
would have found it boring."
Teaching the basics of science through stories, either by using educational
novels (intended as supplements on a syllabus) or narrative-style textbooks
(stand-alone reference books for a course), helps "bring in those people who
would have run away like mad," Ms. Chatterjee insists, noting that seven of
Cumberland's 1,300 students major in physics. Institutions with 30,000
undergraduates can't always say as much, she notes. Potboiler pedagogy lets "you
teach without saying you're teaching."
It's a trick people have been using for years, she adds -- at the
secondary-school level. But only in the last decade, when techniques like
autobiographical scholarship and microhistory (using the story of a single
person or place to illustrate the history of an entire era) rose to the fore,
has storytelling as a teaching tool gained much ground in academe. Even standard
textbooks in fields like business and science have borrowed from the fiction
writer's tool kit, relying on case studies, cartoons, and nonfiction narrative
vignettes to pep up otherwise fusty prose.
But now a growing number of professors are tossing the safety net aside. They're
not just incorporating other people's stories into their classrooms; they're
writing stories themselves. And they're doing it in unlikely disciplines like
mathematics, finance, and economics -- fields in which cold numbers, not
character development, have historically prevailed.
Ten years ago, only a handful of educational novels and narrative-style
textbooks were on the shelves -- and most of them were self-published. Now, a
steady supply of books putting a fictive spin on pedagogy is trickling out, and
some of the bigger trade and scholarly presses are cautiously tacking them onto
their lists. They'll never replace standard textbooks or rival them in the sales
department, but they're becoming accepted in the publishing world, not avoided.
That wasn't always the case. One publisher after another rejected Russell
Roberts's first novel, The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism.
"They said, 'This is great, but supplements don't sell,'" recalls Mr. Roberts, a
senior fellow at the Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public
Policy at Washington University in St. Louis.
They were wrong. Prentice Hall sold nearly 40,000 copies of The Choice, a
free-trade takeoff on It's a Wonderful Life. Business Week named
the novel one of the top 10 books of 1994. And Prentice Hall liked the sales
numbers enough to put out a second edition last year.
Mr. Roberts's second educational novel, The Invisible Heart: An Economic
Romance (2001), was just published by the MIT Press. And his third? Mr.
Roberts has the first 50 pages on his computer.
He's not the only scholar hobnobbing with the muse. Looking for something a
little livelier than your average accounting textbook? Check out The Auditor:
An Instructional Novella (Prentice Hall, 1999) by James K. Loebbecke, a
professor emeritus at the University of Utah. Need a primer on the theory of
joint production? Try A Deadly Indifference: A Henry Spearman Mystery
(Princeton University Press, 1998) by Marshall Jevons, a k a Kenneth G. Elzinga,
an economics professor at the University of Virginia, and William Breit, an
economist at Trinity University. Think your students need caffeine to get
through calculus? Think again.
Hi. My name is Friday -- Joe Friday. I'm a calculus student. I want to tell you a little story -- a story about parabolic boulevards, focal fountains, and a car speeding through the night. I like to call it ... the Case of the Swiveling Spotlight.
-- From Calculus Mysteries & Thrillers (The Mathematical Association of America, 1998).
Calculus Mysteries isn't the math association's first foray into
fiction. The group took a stab at it in cryptology last year. And of the 20
books the group publishes annually, Don Albers, its director of publications and
electronic services, guesses that about three will read more like lively prose
than equation-heavy pedagogy.
"I don't think this is a flash in the educational pan," Mr. Albers says. "The
flow is not diminishing. It's getting stronger."
Robert W. Taylor, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University,
thinks he knows why: Students don't read standard textbooks. Only 17 percent of
the undergraduates in Mr. Taylor's introductory macroeconomics course said in a
poll that they bothered to tackle the assigned text, the eighth edition of
William J. Baumol and Alan S. Blinder's Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy
(Harcourt College Publishers, 2001). Now, 75 percent are reading the assigned
text.
The reason: Mr. Taylor switched textbooks. He's using Life, Love and
Economics (Pearson Custom Publishing, 2000), which he co-wrote with Gavin
Sinclair and Dee E. Cuttell. The romance-novel-cum-textbook follows Jason and
Samantha on their economic journey through life.
"There are worlds of good economics textbooks, and I've been using one of the
best," Mr. Taylor says. "The problem is that I like it better than my students.
I can get them to read five times as much" by using Life, Love and Economics.
After all, he points out, the Baumol and Blinder book "doesn't talk about
bimbos." His does -- as well as monetary policy, marginal revenue, and inelastic
demand.
Traditional textbooks, fans of the narrative approach maintain, talk about too
much -- and too little. They pack in the theories and reams of raw data, but the
real-world side of a field gets short shrift, if it's mentioned at all.
Textbooks don't teach "what an accountant will do or an I.R.S. agent. We're just
taught plain vanilla stuff," says D. Larry Crumbley, an accounting professor at
Louisiana State University and a pioneer on the narrative-pedagogy front. He's
written a dozen educational novels about tax, finance, accounting, even
chemistry, and plans to keep churning them out. His latest is The Big R: An
Internal Auditing Action Adventure (Carolina Academic Press, 2000), which he
co-wrote with Douglas E. Ziegenfuss, an associate professor of accounting at Old
Dominion University, and John J. O'Shaughnessy, an accounting professor at San
Francisco State University. It's a whodunit about a serial murderer terrorizing
major-league baseball, starring an internal auditor and a forensic accountant.
"My novels try to teach students what they'll be doing for the rest of their
lives, as well as making them encounter ethical situations," Mr. Crumbley says.
"A novel is essentially a case study, but the case is 250 pages long."
Traditional textbooks are longer -- by 600 pages or so. "It's not that textbooks
aren't good. They're too good. They're massive," says Thomas Heinzen, an
associate professor of psychology at William Paterson University of New Jersey.
"Textbooks scare people away." That's why he dumped the
everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach to textbook writing and wrote two
anti-textbooks: Eighty Dots: A Novel Way to Teach Psychology (Thomson
Learning, 2000) and Choosing Your Mystery: A Novel Way to Teach Statistics
(Thomson Learning, 2000).
"Cognitively, we're built for stories," Mr. Heinzen says. "It's a friendly way
to teach."
Too friendly perhaps, some professors fear. Dan N. Stone, a professor of
accounting at the University of Kentucky, has written articles promoting
educational fiction. He's even dabbled in it himself. And he favors the
narrative approach to teaching when it's done for the right reasons -- to give
students a real-life sense of a field, to study the ethics of a profession, to
push a discipline to rethink its mission, he says.
But he worries that all the talk of accessibility and engagement undermines the
legitimacy of using plots to promote pedagogy. "The notion that students will
read a novel when they will not read a textbook won't gain us respectability,"
he says. "That's a dumbing-down argument. The next step is let's just show them
a video."
Exactly, says Stan Brue, an economist at Pacific Lutheran University and the
co-author of the top-selling economics textbook on the market. "I'm all for
creative approaches, but I think professors are selling students short. Yes,
students aren't reading as much. They have to be pushed. But there's some
concern in the profession that we're giving up in terms of standards in order to
make things more interesting."
And educational novels require people to give up other things as well -- namely,
class time. Most of these books are intended as side dishes on a syllabus;
they're not the main meal. With time in short supply, it's little wonder some
professors are reluctant to expend any of it on what seem like niceties, not
necessities.
"It is true that a lot of the textbooks are dry, and supplementing them with
narrative can be useful," says Robert J. Ramsay, an accounting professor at the
University of Kentucky. But he hasn't done it. "It's hard enough to cover the
material that we have to cover." The cost -- in time and money -- of using these
books isn't always worth the expense, he says.
Of course, there are costs to writing those page-turners as well. Louisiana
State's Mr. Crumbley published his first four educational novels under a
pseudonym after colleagues, fearful that Mr. Crumbley's "author, author"
aspirations would cast accounting in a trivial light, warned him there would be
professional repercussions if he didn't. The name he chose: Iris Weil Collett --
a play on "I.R.S. will collect." With or without the nom de plume, which
he dropped after moving to Louisiana State, "If I had not had tenure, I wouldn't
have written them," Mr. Crumbley says of his novels.
Most professors think scholars would not have a shot at tenure if they did. "I
wouldn't even try this until you're full faculty," says Kevin D. Stocks, an
accounting professor at Brigham Young University and a co-author of Code Blue
(Traemus Books, 2000), a textbook novel about managed care. "It's not
recognized."
That isn't stopping people from doing it. Terri Friel, an associate professor of
operations management at Butler University, used an educational novel recently
and wasn't wowed by the results. The plot was thin, and it didn't help her
teaching much. But she's not wowed by traditional texts in the field, which can
be as dull as dirt.
Her solution: to write her own narrative textbook. The opening chapters of
several novels are already on her computer.
2 TAKES ON 'OPPORTUNITY COST': WHICH
WOULD YOU RATHER READ?
At the end of the movie, Samantha cleaned up and Jason rewound the movie. As
casually as he could, Jason asked, "Do you think we should date other people?"
Samantha came back from the kitchen. "So that's what this is about. I thought
you were acting funny. Did you see one of your old flames today while you were
buying your snow shovel?"
Once again, Jason was amazed with Samantha's perception. "How did you know?"
Jason asked.
"Men are so predictable," Samantha said. "It only takes one good-looking woman
to get them all messed up."
"I don't know about that. It just got me thinking about what we might be
missing. How do we know we are right for each other? Maybe we should date around
a little to make sure," Jason explained.
"Opportunity cost," said Samantha.
"Huh," said Jason.
"Opportunity cost. That means the value of your next best alternative," said
Samantha. "It's an economics term."
"You even work into economics terms to discuss dating. You're unbelievable,"
said Jason, not too complimentary.
"It's like this. Right now you are with me. You know what that is like. Now you
are wondering what it would be like to be with this other bimbo you met today.
If you are stuck with me, your opportunity cost is what you could be doing with
her," said Samantha.
"I'm not sure I like what you are implying. And Susie is not a bimbo," Jason
said, getting mad.
-- From Life, Love and Economics, by Gavin Sinclair, Robert W. Taylor,
and Dee E. Cuttell (Pearson Custom Publishing, 2000)
The opportunity cost of any decision is the value of the next best
alternative that the decision forces the decision maker to forgo. ...
To illustrate the true cost of an item, consider the decision to produce
additional cars and therefore fewer refrigerators. Although the production of a
car may cost $15,000 per vehicle, or some other money amount, its real cost
to society is the refrigerators that society must forgo to get an additional
car. If the labor, steel, and energy needed to manufacture a car are
sufficient to make 30 refrigerators, the opportunity cost of a car is 30
refrigerators. ...
With limited resources, a decision to have more of one thing is
simultaneously a decision to have less of something else. Hence, the
relevant cost of any decision is its opportunity cost -- the value
of the next best alternative that is given up. Rational decision making must be
based on opportunity-cost calculations.
-- From the eighth edition of Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy, by
William J. Baumol and Alan S. Blinder (Harcourt College Publishers, 2001)
Source: http://chronicle.com/free/v47/i35/35a01201.htm
Section: The Faculty
Page: A12